Sunday, 26 August 2018

Should editors edit reviewers?

›
How Einstein dealt with peer review: from http://theconversation.com/hate-the-peer-review-process-einstein-did-too-27405 This all star...
4 comments:
Monday, 20 August 2018

Matlab vs open source: Costs and benefits to scientists and society

›
An interesting twitter thread came along yesterday, started by this query from Jan Wessel (@wessel_lab): Quick thread of (honest) question...
3 comments:
Saturday, 11 August 2018

More haste less speed in calls for grant proposals

›
Helpful advice from the World Bank This blogpost was prompted by a funding call announced this week by the Economic and Social Resear...
6 comments:
Friday, 20 July 2018

Standing on the shoulders of giants, or slithering around on jellyfish: Why reviews need to be systematic

›
Yesterday I had the pleasure of hearing George Davey Smith (aka @mendel_random) talk. In the course of a wide-ranging lecture he recounted h...
3 comments:
Thursday, 12 July 2018

One big study or two small studies? Insights from simulations

›
At a recent conference, someone posed a question that had been intriguing me for a while: suppose you have limited resources, with the poten...
12 comments:
Tuesday, 26 June 2018

Preprint publication as karaoke

›
 Doing research, analysing the results, and writing it up is a prolonged and difficult process. Submitting the paper to a journal is an a...
1 comment:
Saturday, 9 June 2018

Developmental language disorder: the need for a clinically relevant definition

›
There's been debate over the new terminology for Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) at a meeting (SRCLD) in the USA. I've not got...
4 comments:
Sunday, 27 May 2018

Sowing seeds of doubt: how Gilbert et al’s critique of the reproducibility project has played out

›
In Merchants of Doubt , Eric Conway and Naomi Oreskes describe how raising doubt can be used as an effective wea...
1 comment: