Showing posts with label science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label science. Show all posts
Thursday, 30 March 2023

Open letter to CNRS

›
Need for transparent and robust response when research misconduct is found Scroll down for update on correspondence with CNRS Scientific Int...
15 comments:
Tuesday, 12 April 2022

Book Review. Fiona Fox: Beyond the Hype

›
If you're a scientist reading this, you may well think, as I used to, that running a Science Media Centre (SMC) would be a worthy but r...
Saturday, 10 August 2019

A day out at 10 Downing Street

›
Yesterday, I attended a meeting at 10, Downing Street with Dominic Cummings, special advisor to Boris Johnson, for a discussion about scienc...
3 comments:
Sunday, 26 August 2018

Should editors edit reviewers?

›
How Einstein dealt with peer review: from http://theconversation.com/hate-the-peer-review-process-einstein-did-too-27405 This all star...
4 comments:
Saturday, 17 June 2017

Prospecting for kryptonite: the value of null results

›
-->   This blogpost doesn't say anything new – it just uses a new analogy (at least new to me) to make a point about th...
2 comments:
Saturday, 1 October 2016

On the incomprehensibility of much neurogenetics research

›
Together with some colleagues, I am carrying out an analysis of methodological issues such as statistical power in papers in top neurosci...
12 comments:
Saturday, 11 July 2015

Publishing replication failures: some lessons from history

›
I recently travelled to Lismore, Ireland, to speak at the annual Robert Boyle summer school. I had been intrigued by the invitation, as it ...
4 comments:
Monday, 20 April 2015

How long does a scientific paper need to be?

›
©CartoonStock.com There was an interesting exchange last week on PubMedCommons between Maurice Smith, senior author of a ...
14 comments: